A.M.A.N. Trove • Ambuscade • Dynamis Divergence • Geas Fete • High-Tier Battlefields • Master Trials • Monthly Campaigns • Odyssey • Omen • Skirmish • Sortie • Unity • Vagary | The Voracious Resurgence |
Prime Weapons • Ultimate Weapons • Ultimate Augments • Abjurations iL119 • JSE Necks • Divergence Augments • Escutcheons | |
Reforged Armor Artifact: +1 • iL109 • iL119/+2/+3 Relic: +1/+2 • iL109 • iL119/+2/+3 Empyrean: +1/+2 • iL109 • iL119/+2/+3 |
Guides • Crafting • Trusts • Apex Monsters |
Category talk:Banish Spells: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "Went naked as BLU/whm with a Fermion Sword to Bostaunieux Oubliette to test if Banish will reduce the native damage bonus for undead as this page has claimed since thi...") |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Went naked as BLU/whm with a [[Fermion Sword]] to [[Bostaunieux Oubliette]] to test if Banish will reduce the native damage bonus for undead as this page has claimed since this [https://www.bg-wiki.com/index.php?title=Category:Banish_Spells&oldid=215223 2012 revision]. First off, hounds 12.5% and not 25%, but there is no penalty to the damage bonus for casting banish.<br />Against a [[Garm]] from 100-60% I was dealing 18-25 damage. Satisfied that the minimum of my damage was consistent in this quick eyeballing of a test, I cast Banish II. My damage never went below 18, I cast it again for good measure, and the same.<br />There is no penalty against a damage bonus (E.g. blunt to skeletons) for using Banish against an undead foe. |
Went naked as BLU/whm with a [[Fermion Sword]] to [[Bostaunieux Oubliette]] to test if Banish will reduce the native damage bonus for undead as this page has claimed since this [https://www.bg-wiki.com/index.php?title=Category:Banish_Spells&oldid=215223 2012 revision]. First off, hounds 12.5% and not 25%, but there is no penalty to the damage bonus for casting banish.<br />Against a [[Garm]] from 100-60% I was dealing 18-25 damage. Satisfied that the minimum of my damage was consistent in this quick eyeballing of a test, I cast Banish II. My damage never went below 18, I cast it again for good measure, and the same.<br />There is no penalty against a damage bonus (E.g. blunt to skeletons) for using Banish against an undead foe. |
||
I also take it that this means banish with enhancing effect equipment can not surpass 100% (+0%) damage taken in penalty reduction. --[[User:Spicyryan|Spicyryan]] ([[User talk:Spicyryan|talk]]) 11:26, 2 December 2019 (EST) |
Revision as of 16:35, 2 December 2019
Went naked as BLU/whm with a Fermion Sword to Bostaunieux Oubliette to test if Banish will reduce the native damage bonus for undead as this page has claimed since this 2012 revision. First off, hounds 12.5% and not 25%, but there is no penalty to the damage bonus for casting banish.
Against a Garm from 100-60% I was dealing 18-25 damage. Satisfied that the minimum of my damage was consistent in this quick eyeballing of a test, I cast Banish II. My damage never went below 18, I cast it again for good measure, and the same.
There is no penalty against a damage bonus (E.g. blunt to skeletons) for using Banish against an undead foe.
I also take it that this means banish with enhancing effect equipment can not surpass 100% (+0%) damage taken in penalty reduction. --Spicyryan (talk) 11:26, 2 December 2019 (EST)