The Voracious Resurgence | |
| Prime Weapons • Ultimate Weapons • Ultimate Augments • Abjurations iL119 • JSE Necks • Divergence Augments • Escutcheons | |
| Reforged Armor Artifact: +1 • iL109 • iL119/+2/+3/+4 Relic: +1/+2 • iL109 • iL119/+2/+3/+4 Empyrean: +1/+2 • iL109 • iL119/+2/+3 |
Guides • Crafting • Trusts • Apex Monsters |
Category talk:Fishing/Zone
Where can you find the list of non-fished up fish on bg-wiki? I remember seeing lists, but not sure if it was here or someplace else.
- For example: Arrowwood Log, or Triangle Crab in Carpenters' Landing.
- Note: Just realized this DOES include those items, just that no one has ever entered them into the places I've been fishing in.
I don't think we need to be adding monsters which can be fished up to this table. In 99% of cases they are irrelevant mobs, players who are fishing for skillups or targeting a specific fish will always cancel the cast anyways. In the cases of fished up monsters required for content, such as in Assault, they are specific to that content and clearly noted on that content's page. Furthermore, the addition of these monsters is muddying the tables, there are no icons for them so it makes the list look broken or incomplete. The 1 gil catch is the same way. Hya (talk) 15:26, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
My point of adding them was for ALL INFORMATION in the wiki... not just what some people MAY or MAY NOT want to see. These are still part of the game, and as such should be included somehow. I remember VERY long ago when ALL the caught items - be it an item, fish, or monster - were listed here but now are missing most every monster and some items. I was trying to complete the lists, but seems only things that are beneficial are posted. P.S. I NEVER cancel my casts, as do quite a few others I know, because the unknown fun for fighting can be interesting. Now that we don't have the hundreds of RMT fishing bots, cannot see why it wouldn't want them listed for a more complete wiki. There's just my two gil. Danallen (talk) 02:10, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
That's great, but please at least preview the page when making edits to ensure the changes you have made are in line with the previous quality of the page. Having a bunch of dead links to icons that don't exist does not make for an easily digestible and eloquently presented set of data. You can check the history of this page, at no point were monsters listed previous to your edits. It would be better, I think, to add notes on those individual monster pages detailing where they may be fished up if someone is interested in finding them for some reason. Thanks. Hya (talk) 11:37, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
Why is Labyrinth of Onzozo not in these lists? It should be in the Rise of Zilart listings and not there.